24 Responses to “World Diabetes Day”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. avatar Kev Winchcombe @oceantragic says:

    Hi Zoe, great article, which I’ve just found whilst trying to help a friend who’s being hounded by her Type-1-diabetes-kid’s NHS dietician…why, because she’s trying to reduce her kid’s intake of sugars.

    It seems sad that she would be left alone if her kid ate 400g of carbs per day, laced with Coke and cubes of sugar, whilst no doubt having HbA1C’s of 13% etc..

    What can be done?

    Kev.

    • avatar Zoë Harcombe says:

      Hi Kev – you may like this one too (http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2012/05/diabetes-uk-low-carb-diets-%E2%80%93-what-is-the-official-advice-for-diabetics/)

      I’m so sorry to hear the harassment your friend is getting for doing the right thing for her child. There will be law suits one day – I hope so anyway – for what has been done to so many people by so few. You just have to ignore ignorance and do what you know to be right. (Ideally refuse to see a dietician – I would never see one unless I wanted a laugh!) I’ve only recently persuaded my older brother (type 1 since teens) to start with the nutritious foods (meat, fish, eggs, seeds, veg – esp green/leafy) and then see what room is left for starchy foods. He liked it put that way more than ‘watch your carb intake’ and he soon found he had little room left for fattening things once he’d eaten the nutrient giving things. He’s lost weight (he was in good shape anyway – but he had to work for it – he doesn’t now) and is just feeling better than ever. Lower blood readings, more stable blood readings etc.

      The questions I would ask are:
      Q1) What is diabetes? (The answer is the inability to handle carbs/glucose essentially)
      Q2) So why are you telling a diabetic to base their meals on what they can’t handle?

      Or just don’t engage
      Hope this helps
      Best wishes – Zoe

  2. avatar Mie says:

    Vegetables break down into glucose –> eating a lot of vegetables is bad for diabetics?

    Congratulations. You can’t get the basics of diabetes care much more wrong than that. Never you mind the fact that increased intake of fruit & veggies has been consistently shown to be of importance to diabetics.

    • avatar Jessica says:

      Well, Mie – yes, they are bad for diabetics. But you don’t have to listen to anyone here, why not go out and do your own research. Ask a number of diabetics to eat a meal with the following :-

      Carrots, sweet corn, sugar snap peas, peas, tomatoes, and onions. They will raise the BG levels of most type 2s. Don’t forget, we’re not just looking at a once a week rise, we’re looking at the fact that these will raise them to a harmful point constantly. Everyone has accepted that type 2s get worse as time goes on, but haven’t looked at why that is so. If BGs go up to even 7.1 for long enough, it will cause damage. Then even less tolerance. And therefore more damage. If it is, as many of us know, due to eating the wrong kind of vegetables, and we are then forced to eat more of them, of course diabetes is going to get worse. I know this from personal experimentation, and there are others in the same boat(Dr Richard Bernstein for example). However, I feel certain that you will choose to ignore this because it doesn’t fit in with what you ‘know’.
      Why do you feel that vegetables are so necessary for people anyway?

  3. avatar Rebecca says:

    Many years ago a Ukrainian doctor, Dr Petrunin, told me to eat apples in the morning and drink water or tea.
    Then to have 2 glasses of water at lunch and half a kilo of vegetables, not the starchy ones, and with that 250 grams of carbohydrates. For supper he told me to have 2 glasses of water or herb tea and at least 500 grams of non starchy vegetables uncooked in a salad, together with 250 grams of protein. This has been able to allow me to control my type 2 diabetes for many years without medication and to stay reasonably well.

  4. avatar Sarah Z says:

    Dear Zoe,

    Thank you so much for all of the hard work you do to educate and get the word out about these issues. I just finally listened to your Underground Wellness presentation you gave in the Real Food Summit a couple of summers ago. It was absolutely brilliant. All of you presenters– you just blow the lid off these things. It’s really so inspiring. You are saving lives and improving lives. I just wanted to say thank you. Seriously. I very much look forward to following you and helping to spread the word to help others.

  5. avatar Monica says:

    Hi zoe,i have recently been diagnosed diabetes 7 3 I have stopped eating carbs should i eat small or large amounts of full fat

    • avatar Jessica says:

      Hi Monica, you should buy a testing kit and experiment with it. You should be able to tolerate large amounts of fat, BUT it depends on what type of fat. For example, cheese contains lots of fat but it also contains lactose. If you eat a lot of it, you could be raising your BG levels. It is very important to test, test and test some more so that you can see what your BG levels are doing in reaction to the food you are eating. Also, you can then become confident even when health officials tell you that you are eating the wrong thing that you are doing the right thing for you. We are all different, and we all react differently.
      You could try finding a form – Diabetes Daily is a good one – where people have all done this. They can advise you so that you aren’t just doing something that people tell you to do, you are seeing the evidence and facts for yourself. Good luck, you can take control.

  6. avatar Julie says:

    Hi Zoe

    Great article. Recommending that a third of a diabetics diet comes from carbohydrate is like treating a drug addiction with heroin or an alcohol dependency with a bottle of vodka!

    I’ve had uncontrolled, type 1 diabetes for 27 years, With A1c’s consistently in the teens, no matter what I did I couldn’t stop the glucose roller coaster. I was labelled a bad, non-compliant diabetic even though I struggled continuously to manage the condition.

    Last year, whilst doing a desperate search on the internet, I stumbled upon the idea of eating a low carb diet. Why was I never taught this? I attended DAFNE and yes, learned how to count carbs but was told, ‘it’s ok, you can eat what you want, just match your insulin dose.’ If only it were that easy!

    Now, I follow a LCHF, ketogenic way of eating and follow Dr Bernstein’s rule of small numbers. And it’s working! In 4 months my A1c has come down by over 3% already, my insulin requirement has dropped by nearly 70% and the range of swing in my glucose levels has decreased significantly.

    I am determined that I will become one of the 5%er’s, keeping my A1c in the 5-6% and hopefully, staving off any further complications. This has been the single, most positive action that I’ve taken in gaining near normal glycaemic control. But, it frustrates and maddens me that I had to completely go against conventional dietary recommendations to do so.

    I’m glad there’s so many ‘experts’ coming on board with this way of thinking and really hope that the conventional paradigm is shifting, as further research is carried out. And i’m also grateful for the wisdom of the crowd, the power of people sharing their stories and experience, that then enable us to question everything.

    Julie

  7. avatar Dave says:

    Todays papers carry the story about Reducing Sugar Consumption, great news in itself but sadly only a part of it. Obesity doesn’t inherently mean you are ill, it is after all part of natures survival strategy.

    It`s the artificial ingredients that abound in todays “Products” that are key to stopping so many of the Metabolic conditions. Oh and the advice of “experts”.

    Which boiled down and analysed comes down to motive !

  8. avatar Henrik says:

    Dear Zoe,

    This is an old thread, but I don’t know where else to place this. Today there was a press release in Deccan Herald about some UK doctors reversing Diabetes 2 by crash dieting, a.k.a. starvation. Big news… :-)

    http://www.deccanherald.com/content/378706/british-scientists-test-crash-diet.html

    However, you may want to straighten them (or their PR guys) out on a couple of metabolism issues. The last sentence, for example, says that the liver starts burning fat when we reduce dietary fat. Shouldn’t that be carbs, or rather general caloric restriction?

  9. avatar Ceri says:

    I’m going to print this and show it to my other half’s father. He’s not allowed meat, he says. I thought that was rather strange so as it’s not a place my nose should go, printing is the way! Thanks Zoe :D

    Oh, I’ve lost about 12lbs myself in the last 2 months. Admittedly I slipped up a bit, with pistachios and the like!

    I totally agree Jessica! Surely they will one day use their noggins – it seriously need addressing!

  10. avatar Jessica says:

    Well, Dave, I’d disagree with you there, I know plenty of women who have benefited and I would suspect anyone would do better on a low carb/high fat diet than the opposite!

    But does it not annoy you that the medical professionals almost always look at your results and say, “Well, it works for you” but don’t say, “I wonder if it would work for more of my patients” or “We should try and see if it works for anyone else out there, in case there’s enough evidence to show that it helps diabetic patients”?

  11. avatar Dave says:

    This so hits home, twice in life I hit 20 stone, the second time I was lined up for insulin treatment. Through a fair bit of web browsing and a little leap of faith I gave the Lo Carb route a try. Without getting all righteous about it the thing paid off.
    It does however seem to work better for males than females.
    Since 2007 have been 16.5 stone or thereabouts, minimal meds and Hba1c are where I want them. My GP and Spec nurse simply say ” well it obviously works for you”

  12. avatar Ian says:

    Zoe, I am 53 and have had type 2 diabetes since I was 35. I have spent pretty much all that time battling (1) my blood glucose (2) my weight and (3) my appetite. I have been on THD since mid-July, I have lost about three and a half stone (I’m not fanatical about the scales), I don’t get hungry, I take A QUARTER of the insulin I used to and my blood glucose is normal for the first time in many years. So take some of the credit. :o) best, Ian

    • avatar Zoë says:

      Hi Ian – thanks so much for sharing this – what a difference! Until the Diabetes orgs & doctors wake up, people need to find health their own way – as you’ve done – well done!
      Very best wishes – Zoe

  13. avatar Jessica says:

    SO frustrating to sit here and know that type 2 can at least be controlled if not reversed somewhat. Whilst I still have nerve damage, I have at least seen my levels drop to a healthy 5.something and seen others do the same. For someone to state that children are going to die when they hit forty is outrageous. Why are people giving up? It does not have to be a death sentence. These children could still have a reasonably varied diet, instead of someone like me who has followed medical advice and totally ruined their body. My diet is restricted, but it is not hopeless or uninteresting. I plan for my future, I invest in a pension because I believe I can live to my alloted span, I don’t assume I’m going to die early and give up the diet.
    They have to get heir heads around the fact that procesed sugar hould not enter their diet and carbs need to be restricted. There are still people who eat carbs, just in small quantities and they simply watch their sugar levels.
    I am never going to donate to diabetes UK again, after they ran a donation day at Tescos and gave away – get this – free sweets with every donation.

  14. avatar Glen says:

    Janknitz, fyi the “180 2 hours after a meal” (which refers to 180mg/dl or 10.0 mmol/L blood glucose level) is only considered a target by Diabetes organizations such as Diabetes UK and the American and Canadian Diabetes Associations.

    It’s interesting that both the IDF (International Diabetes Association) and the AACE (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists) have much-more stringent guidelines for post-prandial targets. Both organizations recommend never exceeding 7.8 mmol/L (140mg/dl) post-meal.

    Of course, neither of those organizations are controlled by food or pharmaceutical companies, like Diabetes UK or the Canadian and American Diabetes Associations.

  15. avatar Janknitz says:

    While the definition of diabetes may have changed, it hasn’t changed enough. The blood sugar standards are still TOO HIGH, so that by the time people are diagnosed more organ damage has occurred (including, most likely, more damage to arteries) and more medication is required to bring things under control with the recommended diet full of starches and sugars.

    So-called “normal” blood sugars of less than 100 fasting and 180 2 hours after a meal already indicate significant insulin resistance when fasting is in the upper 90′s and post-prandials are spiking toward 180. Yet people with those blood levels are “watched” while they progress on to higher blood sugar levels and damage.

    This is different than the ever-dropping cholesterol levels that don’t correlate to increased mortality. Diabetes is more like a spectrum that goes unrecognized in the earlier stages. Earlier diagnosis would make great sense with a lifestyle change that didn’t involve a diet full of glucose.

  16. avatar Julie says:

    Very interesting … I have been type II since gestational diabetes some 24 years ago and have just this month been discharged from the Diabetic Clinic. My numbers were so good and my weight was down to ‘normal’ as well, the doctor told me to go away and continue whatever I was doing! Basically, I have been eating virtually no carbs for some months. He was very approving and said to continue. I have been following the ’2-Day diet’, with a slight modification – ie that I had fewer carbs than then suggested on ‘non-restricted’ days.

  17. avatar Jane Knight says:

    Well I think you have nailed a lot of it here However I would also like to point out that the definition of the blood sugar level that is considered diabetic has also changed in the last 20 or so years and this creates its own problems when reviewing the literature. Normal is now abnormal. We would probably have had lots of type 2 children in the past had we applied the same standards, but of course we had no easy electronic measuring devices in the past!!!

  18. avatar PhilT says:

    Excellent.

    Having studies the Diabetes UK web site and their Facebook presence I really don’t know what they are for, beyond employment of their officers and staff.

    They seem to want to turn diabetes into a blue hobby to go along with various breast cancer initiatives clothing their supporters / victims in pink.

  19. avatar fredt says:

    It is difficult to convince a man of something when his paycheck depends on him not understanding.

Please feel free to leave a comment. For personal diet & health questions, please visit The Harcombe Diet Club Forum.


+ 2 = 7